CRUSH YOUR GOALS: Dr. Jan on Realistic Resolutions That Stick
Why Your New Year's Resolutions Failed — And What to Do Instead. It's the 29th of January. Paul has averaged 8,100 steps a day instead of 10,000. Lee has done 10,000 steps on exactly one day — the day he got lost looking for a waterfall for cold water therapy. Both are firmly in the 75% of people who don't achieve their New Year's resolutions. Enter Doctor Jan Ferris — Mind Cake's first ever returning guest and a clinical psychologist — who makes the case that the problem isn't your willpower. It's the context in which you made those resolutions, the lens you were viewing yourself through when you made them, and the fact that you were probably eating Quality Streets at the time. This is a conversation about why threat-based drive doesn't lead to sustainable change, why value-based goals are more likely to actually happen, and why the harshest possible time to make life-changing decisions is when you're horizontal in your loungewear between Christmas and New Year. Plus: Izzy does the intro in one take, haggis taxonomy, the green triangle vs the pink Quality Street, and a controversial dietary episode that will not be named.
Listen on Spotify ↗Show Notes
Guest: Doctor Jan Ferris— clinical psychologist and Mind Cake's first ever returning guest. First appeared in an earlier episode on ACT (Acceptance and Commitment Therapy). This episode was originally planned as a 10 minute chat and ran to nearly 40.
Recorded: Burns Night (25 January). Vegetarian haggis was had. It was, controversially, better.
Note: Izzy did the intro. One take. She's six.
Topics covered:
The statistics
- Approximately 10% of people fully achieve their New Year's resolutions
- Another 10-15% partially achieve them
- The vast majority — 75% — do not achieve them
- Lee and Paul are firmly in the majority. Paul averaged 8,100 steps a day. Lee did 10,000 steps once
Why resolutions fail — the context problem
- Most resolutions are made between Christmas and New Year, in the worst possible psychological state: self-critical, post-indulgent, cosy on the sofa
- That context — half a tin of Quality Streets down, in your loungewear — is the perfect breeding ground for two things: unrealistic goal setting and harsh self-criticism
- The harshness of the lens through which we view ourselves when making resolutions directly impacts whether those goals are achievable
- We give New Year's resolutions enormous weight because of the date — but the same thing happens every Monday. "The diet starts Monday" is a cultural pattern
Why self-criticism doesn't work
- Making goals through a harsh, self-critical lens makes them almost impossible to achieve
- When we fail, the internal critic perpetuates a vicious cycle — which itself makes further failure more likely
- What we don't need are more sticks to beat ourselves with
- What works better: a compassionate, values-based lens
The values-based approach (ACT framework)
- Instead of asking "what do I need to fix about myself?" ask "what matters most to me?"
- Goals aligned with genuine values are more likely to be achieved and more likely to be sustainable
- Common resolutions (weight, gym, diet) are almost always made from the harshest version of the self-critical mind — not from values
- Values-based alternatives Lee immediately responds to: "come up with two new storylines this year" — his shoulders literally went back
- Dr Jan's focus for the year: connection — with the people who matter most. No specific targets, no weekly schedule, just prioritising it in the diary
Understanding why you do what you do
- Before removing a behaviour, understand its function
- The coffee example: four cups of coffee a day makes perfect sense if you're running a 16-hour day with multiple competing demands. Just cutting it out without addressing that context is almost impossible
- Old patterns re-emerge because the need they served hasn't been met in another way
- When we re-engage with old patterns, we experience them through a lens of failure rather than compassionate understanding — which makes everything worse
Threat-based drive vs value-based drive
- Lee's triathlon training: he only signed up for events out of fear of looking stupid at the start line — classic threat-based drive
- That produces short-term results but doesn't lead to sustainable change
- It also means bouncing away from difficult emotions rather than sitting with them — short-term relief, long-term perpetuation
- The alternative: moving towards something that genuinely matters, rather than away from something you fear
Lee's resolution confession
- 2023 resolution: lose 23lbs, run a 10K PB
- Outcome: ended the year at over 17 stone (put on half a stone), never ran a 10K
- 2024 resolution: 10,000 steps a day in January
- Outcome: achieved it once
- Facebook memories showing him running 50 miles for Maggie's three years earlier, shortly after two major operations and radioactive iodine treatment, did not help the internal critic
Gemma's wisdom
- Post-diagnosis, Lee was trying to run 50 miles in January for Maggie's while physically unwell
- Gemma: "Lee, you've just been diagnosed with terminal cancer. I don't think anyone is going to ask for their tenner back."
- Lee still went out and ran. But the principle stands.
The menu system
- Lee's approach from a previous episode: a menu of good habits (10,000 steps, 2 litres of water, cold shower, meditation, 8 hours sleep, no alcohol, no snacking)
- Aim for any two from the menu each day — whatever feels achievable that day
- Takes the pressure off perfection and builds the habit of choosing towards moves
Dr Jan's practical recommendation
- Russ Harris's Values Checklist — a free exercise to help identify what matters most to you. Link in the linktree
- Rather than resolutions, think about your focus word for the year: connection, adventure, creativity
- Then commit to specific actions that move you towards that value
Post-episode:
- Paul feels better about his 8,100 steps — shoulders back
- Lee immediately starts thinking about storylines and script ideas
- Both mums listen to the podcast. Hello to both mums
Also this episode:
- The green triangle Quality Street: Dr Jan's favourite. Nutty, softer chocolate
- The pink strawberry Quality Street: Lee's favourite. Nobody else in the office wanted them, which was convenient
- The round toffees: nobody's favourite. They break your teeth
- Roses coffee soft centres: discontinued. Dr Jan is still not over it
- The controversial dietary incident: referenced but not named. It was horrible. They lost a bit of weight, didn't look healthy, felt terrible, and will not be doing it again
- Barry Bethel: mentioned. Context unclear. Massive trousers involved
- Arthur Bostrom (Officer Crabtree from 'Allo 'Allo): Lee's stated mission to get him on the podcast in 2024. Still pending at time of recording
- Aaron's new game: Mr Men Guess Who. He's four. She's well into it
Referenced:
- ACT (Acceptance and Commitment Therapy) — Dr Jan's previous episode, referenced throughout
- Russ Harris's Values Checklist — free online resource for identifying personal values
- Maggie's Cancer Centres — Lee ran 50 miles for them in January post-diagnosis
- Soulful Sundays (Portobello Beach) — mentioned from previous episode, Lee still planning to participate